<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SchemaLogic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2007/08/09/schemalogic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2007/08/09/schemalogic/</link>
	<description>About David Weinberger's book (May, 2007) and how we're pulling ourselves together now that we've blown ourselves to bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2007/08/09/schemalogic/comment-page-1/#comment-22333</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2007/08/09/schemalogic/#comment-22333</guid>
		<description>And those much better and more affordable are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And those much better and more affordable are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km4</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2007/08/09/schemalogic/comment-page-1/#comment-20551</link>
		<dc:creator>km4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2007/08/09/schemalogic/#comment-20551</guid>
		<description>David, did you check the bio and industry experience of Lowell Anderson, VP of Marketing for SchemaLogic. This guy doesn&#039;t know the difference between a taxonomy and ontology. 

Moreover, Schemalogic claims to to do business semantics but if you look under the covers their proprietary software has really nothing to do with semantics ( e.g. the interrelationships and meaning of objects using conceptual models and logical theory ) 

Schemalogic is just glorified and overpriced software that uses syntactics ( relational XML model using controlled vocabularies ) combined with structural interoperability ( thesaurus, XML schema ). 

Top down rigid taxomonies is really all they provide with some very lame change control and there are much better and more affordable solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, did you check the bio and industry experience of Lowell Anderson, VP of Marketing for SchemaLogic. This guy doesn&#8217;t know the difference between a taxonomy and ontology. </p>
<p>Moreover, Schemalogic claims to to do business semantics but if you look under the covers their proprietary software has really nothing to do with semantics ( e.g. the interrelationships and meaning of objects using conceptual models and logical theory ) </p>
<p>Schemalogic is just glorified and overpriced software that uses syntactics ( relational XML model using controlled vocabularies ) combined with structural interoperability ( thesaurus, XML schema ). </p>
<p>Top down rigid taxomonies is really all they provide with some very lame change control and there are much better and more affordable solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
