<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tagging things or thinging tags?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/01/08/tagging-things-or-thinging-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/01/08/tagging-things-or-thinging-tags/</link>
	<description>About David Weinberger's book (May, 2007) and how we're pulling ourselves together now that we've blown ourselves to bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean Landolt</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/01/08/tagging-things-or-thinging-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-42465</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Landolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/01/08/tagging-things-or-thinging-tags/#comment-42465</guid>
		<description>Geoff:

But that&#039;s his point: a hierarchy of tags embodies this &quot;containment&quot; metaphor rather than the flat approach traditionally implied by *tags*. There&#039;s certainly value in a hierarchy, especially if it&#039;s just a pseudo-hierarchy as hinted at by the tree-of-tags metaphore -- but, at least to me, calling this structure &quot;tagging&quot; seems like a perversion of the concept. Perhaps, as Weinberger notes, &quot;categories&quot; would be more descriptive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff:</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s his point: a hierarchy of tags embodies this &#8220;containment&#8221; metaphor rather than the flat approach traditionally implied by *tags*. There&#8217;s certainly value in a hierarchy, especially if it&#8217;s just a pseudo-hierarchy as hinted at by the tree-of-tags metaphore &#8212; but, at least to me, calling this structure &#8220;tagging&#8221; seems like a perversion of the concept. Perhaps, as Weinberger notes, &#8220;categories&#8221; would be more descriptive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Coupe</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/01/08/tagging-things-or-thinging-tags/comment-page-1/#comment-42114</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Coupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/01/08/tagging-things-or-thinging-tags/#comment-42114</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because you can drag the tags themselves into a hierarchy of tags... Try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because you can drag the tags themselves into a hierarchy of tags&#8230; Try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
