<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keen vs. Me: The Word clouds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/02/05/keen-vs-me-the-word-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/02/05/keen-vs-me-the-word-clouds/</link>
	<description>About David Weinberger's book (May, 2007) and how we're pulling ourselves together now that we've blown ourselves to bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hal O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/02/05/keen-vs-me-the-word-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-45018</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2008/02/05/keen-vs-me-the-word-clouds/#comment-45018</guid>
		<description>The thing that amuses me, of course, is Keen&#039;s out-and-out hypocrisy and projection.  As far as I can tell, he is not a credentialed expert on anything.  His argumentation tends to be amateurish in the worst sense.  Almost all of his complaints apply to himself.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;The problem, however, with Web 2.0 is that most of the conversation seems to be taking place anonymously, conducted -- in a manner of speaking -- by people who are more interested in vulgar insult than respectful intellectual intercourse.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

...and he&#039;s just the disrespectful, vulgarly insulting fellow to know. We have it on his own authority, to use a phrase of Miss Austen&#039;s. (There being no way to know how often he writes anonymously.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that amuses me, of course, is Keen&#8217;s out-and-out hypocrisy and projection.  As far as I can tell, he is not a credentialed expert on anything.  His argumentation tends to be amateurish in the worst sense.  Almost all of his complaints apply to himself.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;The problem, however, with Web 2.0 is that most of the conversation seems to be taking place anonymously, conducted &#8212; in a manner of speaking &#8212; by people who are more interested in vulgar insult than respectful intellectual intercourse.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>&#8230;and he&#8217;s just the disrespectful, vulgarly insulting fellow to know. We have it on his own authority, to use a phrase of Miss Austen&#8217;s. (There being no way to know how often he writes anonymously.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
