<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Wikipedia getting too hard? A random sampling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2009/02/23/is-wikipedia-getting-too-hard-a-random-sampling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2009/02/23/is-wikipedia-getting-too-hard-a-random-sampling/</link>
	<description>About David Weinberger's book (May, 2007) and how we're pulling ourselves together now that we've blown ourselves to bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tedy</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2009/02/23/is-wikipedia-getting-too-hard-a-random-sampling/comment-page-1/#comment-191202</link>
		<dc:creator>tedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=7884#comment-191202</guid>
		<description>Only 34 days before DOFUS 2.0! December 2nd will be here before we know &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bawwgt.com/fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dofus kamas&lt;/a&gt;. On &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bawwgt.com/fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dofus kamas pas cher&lt;/a&gt; every player will discover a completely new DOFUS experience. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bawwgt.com/fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;acheter des dofus kamas&lt;/a&gt; have to be content with the reports and forums. Even so &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bawwgt.com/fr&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;achat dofus kamas&lt;/a&gt;, there¡¯s always a few of our dear players in the forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 34 days before DOFUS 2.0! December 2nd will be here before we know <a href="http://www.bawwgt.com/fr" rel="nofollow">dofus kamas</a>. On <a href="http://www.bawwgt.com/fr" rel="nofollow">dofus kamas pas cher</a> every player will discover a completely new DOFUS experience. <a href="http://www.bawwgt.com/fr" rel="nofollow">acheter des dofus kamas</a> have to be content with the reports and forums. Even so <a href="http://www.bawwgt.com/fr" rel="nofollow">achat dofus kamas</a>, there¡¯s always a few of our dear players in the forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.everythingismiscellaneous.com/2009/02/23/is-wikipedia-getting-too-hard-a-random-sampling/comment-page-1/#comment-173663</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/?p=7884#comment-173663</guid>
		<description>Hi,

If you find that standard wikipedia entry too hard, there is the simple english version. See example on Phenomenology below. Makes you wonder why the standard entry has to be so difficult.

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology

In philosophy, phenomenology is a way of thinking about ourselves. Instead of asking about what we really are, it focuses on phenomena. These are experiences that we get from the senses - what we see, taste, smell, touch, hear, and feel. Phenomenology does not ask if what we are seeing is actually there. It also does not ask if we are missing something, or if we have all the facts. Instead, phenomenologists (those who do phenomenology) believe we should look at the world just as it appears to us.

Martin Heidegger, a famous phenomenologist, said that philosophers should be looking at how we live in our &quot;average everydayness.&quot; [1] In his book Being and Time, he uses many examples of how people live in their normal lives. Jean-Paul Sartre did the same in his book Being and Nothingness. For example, he writes about meeting a friend at a cafe. However, the friend, named Pierre, never shows up. Sartre writes that he can feel the absence of Pierre in the cafe. Because of this, he says that non-Pierre (or the lack of Pierre) is something that exists, at least for him. It exists because he can feel it.[2]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>If you find that standard wikipedia entry too hard, there is the simple english version. See example on Phenomenology below. Makes you wonder why the standard entry has to be so difficult.</p>
<p><a href="http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology" rel="nofollow">http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology</a></p>
<p>In philosophy, phenomenology is a way of thinking about ourselves. Instead of asking about what we really are, it focuses on phenomena. These are experiences that we get from the senses &#8211; what we see, taste, smell, touch, hear, and feel. Phenomenology does not ask if what we are seeing is actually there. It also does not ask if we are missing something, or if we have all the facts. Instead, phenomenologists (those who do phenomenology) believe we should look at the world just as it appears to us.</p>
<p>Martin Heidegger, a famous phenomenologist, said that philosophers should be looking at how we live in our &#8220;average everydayness.&#8221; [1] In his book Being and Time, he uses many examples of how people live in their normal lives. Jean-Paul Sartre did the same in his book Being and Nothingness. For example, he writes about meeting a friend at a cafe. However, the friend, named Pierre, never shows up. Sartre writes that he can feel the absence of Pierre in the cafe. Because of this, he says that non-Pierre (or the lack of Pierre) is something that exists, at least for him. It exists because he can feel it.[2]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
